<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not Such A Hit!</title>
	<link>http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/10/27/not-such-a-hit/</link>
	<description>Watches and timepieces for the connoisseur.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Hor Ology</title>
		<link>http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/10/27/not-such-a-hit/#comment-139367</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 06:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/10/27/not-such-a-hit/#comment-139367</guid>
					<description>Well almost 2 years have past and Hublot is still no dud. I don't see them collecting dust on shelves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well almost 2 years have past and Hublot is still no dud. I don&#8217;t see them collecting dust on shelves.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/10/27/not-such-a-hit/#comment-17573</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 15:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/10/27/not-such-a-hit/#comment-17573</guid>
					<description>If the watch is your flavor, cool, not for me as you know.  Breitling has some great pieces, just no after market to speak of, still a heavy hitter in the industry and a real nice case design for everyday wear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the watch is your flavor, cool, not for me as you know.  Breitling has some great pieces, just no after market to speak of, still a heavy hitter in the industry and a real nice case design for everyday wear.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Altair</title>
		<link>http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/10/27/not-such-a-hit/#comment-17571</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 06:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/10/27/not-such-a-hit/#comment-17571</guid>
					<description>OK so Hublot did not sell that well before but that does not tale away from this being a great watch. It is named the Big Bang (signaling the Brand's revival) after all.

It is finely made, decent movement and for the look, material, finish and desirability very well priced!

But hey what do I know? My favorite brand is Breitling :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK so Hublot did not sell that well before but that does not tale away from this being a great watch. It is named the Big Bang (signaling the Brand&#8217;s revival) after all.</p>
<p>It is finely made, decent movement and for the look, material, finish and desirability very well priced!</p>
<p>But hey what do I know? My favorite brand is Breitling <img src='http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/10/27/not-such-a-hit/#comment-16033</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 01:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/10/27/not-such-a-hit/#comment-16033</guid>
					<description>Pay list? I would not pay for it at all! If I wanted a Royal Oak, I would get it, but a Hublot.  I am used to selling them half off in a sale case, one over-marketed watch will not make much of a change to a brand known for rubber straps, ETA quartz movements, and dust collecting sales in past years. Don't believe the marketing, in two years this watch will be worth nothing and you will be sitting on a Big Dud of your own. Trust me! CTWG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pay list? I would not pay for it at all! If I wanted a Royal Oak, I would get it, but a Hublot.  I am used to selling them half off in a sale case, one over-marketed watch will not make much of a change to a brand known for rubber straps, ETA quartz movements, and dust collecting sales in past years. Don&#8217;t believe the marketing, in two years this watch will be worth nothing and you will be sitting on a Big Dud of your own. Trust me! CTWG
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lew Block</title>
		<link>http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/10/27/not-such-a-hit/#comment-16025</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 12:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/10/27/not-such-a-hit/#comment-16025</guid>
					<description>Can't believe this. I own two Big Bangs, it is the nicest watch on the market today, cutting edge materials and technology.

Hard to get? Yes, because EVERYBODY wants one.

I think you must have sour grapes because you have to pay close to list for them. I am telling you, it is worth it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t believe this. I own two Big Bangs, it is the nicest watch on the market today, cutting edge materials and technology.</p>
<p>Hard to get? Yes, because EVERYBODY wants one.</p>
<p>I think you must have sour grapes because you have to pay close to list for them. I am telling you, it is worth it!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Bubba</title>
		<link>http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/10/27/not-such-a-hit/#comment-2082</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/10/27/not-such-a-hit/#comment-2082</guid>
					<description>CTWG,

As always you pick the best and have the deal on the watches we need to know about.  Another great entry.  CTWG is a BFL...Blogger for Life???

Holla,

Joe Dogs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CTWG,</p>
<p>As always you pick the best and have the deal on the watches we need to know about.  Another great entry.  CTWG is a BFL&#8230;Blogger for Life???</p>
<p>Holla,</p>
<p>Joe Dogs
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: aj</title>
		<link>http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/10/27/not-such-a-hit/#comment-2009</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 22:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/10/27/not-such-a-hit/#comment-2009</guid>
					<description>Well, its close.

But it has different screws and its got a few more complications...
I'd take either one</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, its close.</p>
<p>But it has different screws and its got a few more complications&#8230;<br />
I&#8217;d take either one
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: WristWatchReview.com &#187; Hublot Big Bang: Played Out?</title>
		<link>http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/10/27/not-such-a-hit/#comment-1887</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 17:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/10/27/not-such-a-hit/#comment-1887</guid>
					<description>[...] Not Such A Hit! [Chad the Watch Guy] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Not Such A Hit! [Chad the Watch Guy] [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dominic Rickicki</title>
		<link>http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/10/27/not-such-a-hit/#comment-1868</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 13:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/10/27/not-such-a-hit/#comment-1868</guid>
					<description>hey uncle chad cool site</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey uncle chad cool site
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
