<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Leak Mystic (mistake)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/05/16/the-leak-mystic-mistake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/05/16/the-leak-mystic-mistake/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 21:53:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/05/16/the-leak-mystic-mistake/#comment-197322</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/05/16/the-leak-mystic-mistake/#comment-197322</guid>
		<description>Living? Hmmmm. Maybe a secret code for not diving, but just normal living, washing hands etc. Would be my guess. CTWG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Living? Hmmmm. Maybe a secret code for not diving, but just normal living, washing hands etc. Would be my guess. CTWG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/05/16/the-leak-mystic-mistake/#comment-197311</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/05/16/the-leak-mystic-mistake/#comment-197311</guid>
		<description>I was wondering if you ever came across the expression living waterproof watch!!

What does that mean?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering if you ever came across the expression living waterproof watch!!</p>
<p>What does that mean?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/05/16/the-leak-mystic-mistake/#comment-4935</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/05/16/the-leak-mystic-mistake/#comment-4935</guid>
		<description>Yes,


The gray area is here, I often look to the model and who put this product on the market (Quality Gage!).  You should be able to wear this timepiece in the tub, shower etc.  Just don&#039;t go too far with the water activities.  By the way, what is the company? CTWG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes,</p>
<p>The gray area is here, I often look to the model and who put this product on the market (Quality Gage!).  You should be able to wear this timepiece in the tub, shower etc.  Just don&#8217;t go too far with the water activities.  By the way, what is the company? CTWG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colleen</title>
		<link>http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/05/16/the-leak-mystic-mistake/#comment-4921</link>
		<dc:creator>Colleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 00:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/05/16/the-leak-mystic-mistake/#comment-4921</guid>
		<description>Hello- I just received a watch that is 3 atm- can you wear it in the shower or bath tub? It sounds like if I am doing the calculations right- it should be fine -I am just not sure with this Gray area??Thank-you for all  your help...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello- I just received a watch that is 3 atm- can you wear it in the shower or bath tub? It sounds like if I am doing the calculations right- it should be fine -I am just not sure with this Gray area??Thank-you for all  your help&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/05/16/the-leak-mystic-mistake/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 19:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/05/16/the-leak-mystic-mistake/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Yeah,  these are big names, nice watches in my opinion.  Tissot Swatch group watch with nice relationship to Omega-their watch is tested properly.  Oris also very good watch I have sold in the past and like a great deal. You have two nice watches, both quality and very water tight.  Keep the crowns screwed down and you should have no problem with either.CTWG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah,  these are big names, nice watches in my opinion.  Tissot Swatch group watch with nice relationship to Omega-their watch is tested properly.  Oris also very good watch I have sold in the past and like a great deal. You have two nice watches, both quality and very water tight.  Keep the crowns screwed down and you should have no problem with either.CTWG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl stovall</title>
		<link>http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/05/16/the-leak-mystic-mistake/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl stovall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 16:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/05/16/the-leak-mystic-mistake/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>What are your thoughts on watches like the Tissot Seastar 300 M and the Oris TT1 Professional Divers Regulator 1000meters â€œDER MEISTERTAUCHER&quot; ref no: 649.7541.70.64. ISO2281

I know they say they have been tested, but are they for real?

I have both of these diver watches and they never see water from the sink much less diving...I just love the weight, sizes and total over all look like most men do. 
Would love to know what you think.  Are they for real?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are your thoughts on watches like the Tissot Seastar 300 M and the Oris TT1 Professional Divers Regulator 1000meters â€œDER MEISTERTAUCHER&#8221; ref no: 649.7541.70.64. ISO2281</p>
<p>I know they say they have been tested, but are they for real?</p>
<p>I have both of these diver watches and they never see water from the sink much less diving&#8230;I just love the weight, sizes and total over all look like most men do.<br />
Would love to know what you think.  Are they for real?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/05/16/the-leak-mystic-mistake/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 20:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/05/16/the-leak-mystic-mistake/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Ben,

Not too bad for pool wear, but be careful.  9 times out of ten it is the crown that will give you trouble.  Make sure these models have a screw down crown (a must).  Always have your battey service or overhauls done by a pro, and then tell him your going to the bahamas tomorrow to dive for a personal record depth(150ft.) and you rely more on your watch than the dive computer.(If he squirms, still a pool watch) CTWG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben,</p>
<p>Not too bad for pool wear, but be careful.  9 times out of ten it is the crown that will give you trouble.  Make sure these models have a screw down crown (a must).  Always have your battey service or overhauls done by a pro, and then tell him your going to the bahamas tomorrow to dive for a personal record depth(150ft.) and you rely more on your watch than the dive computer.(If he squirms, still a pool watch) CTWG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/05/16/the-leak-mystic-mistake/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 12:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/05/16/the-leak-mystic-mistake/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the clarification, Chad.  One last question: what about 5 ATM watches?  I&#039;ve got two of them that I&#039;ve swum with (never deeper than 10&#039;!).  Is that a safe depth?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification, Chad.  One last question: what about 5 ATM watches?  I&#8217;ve got two of them that I&#8217;ve swum with (never deeper than 10&#8242;!).  Is that a safe depth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad</title>
		<link>http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/05/16/the-leak-mystic-mistake/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 14:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/05/16/the-leak-mystic-mistake/#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Ben, 

No you probably would not go down to that depth, but you might jump off a diving board, ride a water ski, things of this nature.  The resistantance is measured in a tank, calm and steady the pressure is added, it does not take into account quick forces of water pressure.  This is how most people break their watch.  There is a gray area in the article, it was meant to give a nice basic outline. Stay dry! CTWG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben, </p>
<p>No you probably would not go down to that depth, but you might jump off a diving board, ride a water ski, things of this nature.  The resistantance is measured in a tank, calm and steady the pressure is added, it does not take into account quick forces of water pressure.  This is how most people break their watch.  There is a gray area in the article, it was meant to give a nice basic outline. Stay dry! CTWG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/05/16/the-leak-mystic-mistake/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 12:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chadthewatchguy.com/2006/05/16/the-leak-mystic-mistake/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>So, um, why is a watch designed to 3 ATM considered &quot;water resistant?&quot;  I mean, I can&#039;t imagine that I&#039;d ever go down to 99 feet, so what&#039;s the deal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, um, why is a watch designed to 3 ATM considered &#8220;water resistant?&#8221;  I mean, I can&#8217;t imagine that I&#8217;d ever go down to 99 feet, so what&#8217;s the deal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

